Monthly Archives: September 2011

Posted by on 29 September

City Clerk responds to questions about FOI audit. (Follow-up to: You don’t have a right to know)

Yesterday, in a post entitled “You don’t have a right to know”, I wrote about how the City of Hamilton responded to questions from the Newspapers Canada national FOI audit. The City of Hamilton did not look good in the report. I asked the City Clerk questions about the City’s response to the FOI request. What follows are the answers of the City Clerk. My thoughts follow the response.

City Clerk’s response:

Q1. Clarify the reasoning for decision to charge a fee for a record.

The City of Hamilton processes FOI requests in a consistent manner in accordance with the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. The calculation of a processing fee is part of preparing an access decision pursuant to Section 45 of the Act.

When applicable, a decision will waive fees for processing that are less than or equal to $5.00. This is in accordance with Ontario Regulation 823. This was not the case with the decision in question as the fee was $23.70.

Q2. Confirm there is no records of contract with Frank Cowan Company Limited.

I am confirming the city has no contract with Frank Cowan Company Limited. The City contracts the services of an Insurance Broker through an RFP process. The Broker places the insurance coverage with an insurer(s) (such as Frank Cowan Company) on behalf of the City. Placement of the insurance with the insurer and payment of the premium is approved by Council. Council approved this decision at its February 17th, 2010 Council meeting via Motion 7.1 2010 Property/Liability Policies Renewal (FCS100008).

Q3. Clarify process that lead to the reconsideration of Council’s January 17th, 2010 decision.

There was no meeting of Council, or Committee of the Whole on January 17th, 2010 or January 8th, 2010 referenced in your e-mail….I believe you are referring to the Council meeting of February 17th, 2010 and Committee of the Whole meeting of February 8th, 2010.

There was no reconsideration at either meeting.

If you follow the February 8th, 2010 meeting of Committee of the Whole, you will note Discussion Item 8.3 2010 Property/Liability Policies Renewal (FCS10008) is listed on the agenda. Following in the Minutes of this meeting ( pg 10) you will note this Item was tabled. This item was tabled pending in-camera discussion of Item 11.2 (Avero matter). Committee did not go into closed session for Item 8.3 and it remained tabled (see pg 11 of the CoW Report 10-006).

I’ve provided the link below to the February 8th, 2010 Committee of the Whole agenda, where you can access the minutes and reports of said meeting and Report FCS10008 as well:

http://www.hamilton.ca/CityDepartments/CorporateServices/Clerks/AgendaMinutes/CommitteeWhole/2010/February8CommitteeoftheWholeAgenda.htm

Council, at its February 17th meeting via motion 7.1, raised Item 8.3, tabled in CoW on February 8th, and the recommendation from report FCS10008 was approved.

See Minutes (page 2) via the link to this meeting of Council:

http://www.hamilton.ca/CityDepartments/CorporateServices/Clerks/AgendaMinutes/Council/2010/February17SpecialCouncilAgenda.htm

 

My thoughts about the response:

The City of Hamilton followed the letter of the law in processing these requests. We can and should strive to do better.

The cost of processing fees under $50.00 results is near the cost of the fees recovered. Charging fees can discourage the public from exercising their freedom of information rights. The goal of FOI should be the widest possible dissemination of government information to advance the democratic ideals of our Dominion.

The decision to respond stating the there is no record is a half-truth. The City understood the intent of the request – to see government spending approved by City Council. The request used the exact wording from the City Council meeting. To make it that citizens must understand the bureaucracy shell games involved in government cost centre accounting is a blatant violation of the spirit of transparency.

It is legal – the City is not required to give help to citizens requesting information and is allowed to give misleading truths. That’s what the City did.

For action by City Council:

City Council must correct the failings of our “Freedom of Information” procedures at the local level. Waive fees under a higher set amount, be that $25, $50, or another figure. Let’s save ourselves the hassle of spending more money collecting than we receive.

City Council must adopt a policy that we’ll assist citizens with understanding the shell games of contracts and bureaucracy. Meeting the minimum legal standards of existing legislation is inadequacy and a clear violation of the spirit of Freedom of Information. Hamilton – we don’t do more than necessary – doesn’t have the same buzz as “the best place to raise a child.” Being the best place to raise a child includes being the best place to get public information. A more informed society is a better one to raise a child, let’s work towards it together.

0 0 56 more
Posted by on 27 September

You don’t have a right to know

Is the president and CEO of Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation expensing taxpayers for muffins?

Probably not.

It doesn’t matter what he is or is not expensing to taxpayers – Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation isn’t required to act transparently and they have no intention of voluntarily providing information.

Want to know how much money the City of Hamilton is spending on public relations staffing?

Be ready to pay for that information; the City of Hamilton is the only municipality unwilling to give basic information about public spending without nickle-and-diming for every cent they’re legally able to charge as a barrier to public requests.

Looking for a city contract you’re sure exists?

Don’t count on government officials to know it exists.

These are just three of the many examples of government bodies denying information or acting inconsistently found in the sixth annual Freedom of Information Audit by Newspapers Canada, the trade association of Canada’s newspaper industry.

The Audit is the most comprehensive test of the freedom of information system in Canada. Lead by Fred Vallance-Jones, assistant professor of journalism at the University of King’s College in Halifax, a team of King’s College students send the similar FOI requests to many jurisdictions across the country and log the responses.

Agencies audited in Hamilton

Letter from Hamilton Health Sciences in response to request for info from 2011 FOI audit conducted by Newspapers Canada
Hamilton Health Sciences

The audit asked many hospitals across Canada to release the credit card statements of their respective executive heads. Hamilton Health Sciences received a request. The request sent to hospitals asked for:

All credit card statements from 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 for any government-issued or corporate credit card issued for use of the most senior hospital employee in carrying out his or her duties. If no such card exists, all travel and entertainment expense claims filed by the same employee for the same time period.

Hamilton Health Sciences responded, after 34 days, by denying the request noting they remain exempt from freedom of information until 2012.

(Aside: In an interesting coincidence, Hamilton Health Sciences posted a job opening for a “Freedom of Information Specialist” on the same day the audit was released)

City of Hamilton

The City of Hamilton was the recipient of three requests from the audit.

The City quickly responded to two of the requests quickly. A request for public relations staffing costs was more slowly processed and Hamilton was the only municipality to attempt charging a fee to release this information.

Municipal social media policy

The City was asked to provide:

Any guidelines for personal or business use of social media sites by municipal employees. Social media sites include but are not limited to Twitter and Facebook.

The city responded to the request in 6 days providing King’s College with the full policy.

Knowing how much the city spends on PR will cost you

The second request to the City of Hamilton asked the staffing and budget for the city’s public communications:

Records indicating the number of person years and the annual budget for each of the past three fiscal years for public communications (including media relations).

Hamilton was the only municipality to request a fee for the record with other municipalities willingly providing the information or responding they do not have dedicated individuals for public relations.

Hamilton, Ontario was the only municipality to ask for a fee, a fee so small it may not have been worth charging. It certainly had the effect of making Hamilton less transparent by introducing delay to the process. The fee of $23.70 was made up of 40 minutes of search time, $3.50 to prepare the records for disclosure and 20 cents to photocopy one page.

The City needs to be less bureaucratic and more transparent. A simple request needs not be turned into a molehill. There are no reasonable grounds that City budget information should be not be available to the public at no charge. We should adopt the recommendation of the audit and waive any fees less than $50.

Municipal contract information

Both municipalities and federal government departments were asked to provide a copy of an individual contract requested. This tests the government’s willingness to give information about how it spends taxpayer’s money.

The City of Hamilton was asked to provide its contract with Frank Cowan Company Limited (FCCL) for Liability and Property Insurance coverage valued at $3,951,257.

The City responded in 2 days stating they have no record of this contract.

Where’s the Contract? Does it exist?

The statement by the City that no record of the requested contract with FCCL exists requires further review.

It’s easy to forget that Frank Cowan Company Limited contract was one of the most contentious issues dividing City Council during the Winter of 2010. It seems so long ago – or as we say, before the ongoing Pan Am Games fiasco.

The FCCL debate ragged in January and February of 2010 dividing Council and ended in a controversial vote.

Committee of the Whole considered the renewal of insurance with FCCL on January February 8, 2010. The consideration was tabled to the in-camera portion of the meeting that day. No decision was made and the matter was deferred to a later date.

On February 17, 2010, Council waived its procedural bylaws and in a standing recorded vote decided to renew their contract with FCCL for 2010 at a cost of $3,951,257. The vote was 6-4 with 6 Councillors absent from the meeting.

There is no record of Council rescinding the decision. It is possible that Council met in-camera and decided to overturn their decision. If they did, then no record of the contract would exist. However, Council would need to purchase insurance elsewhere or vote to “self-insure” – both of which require a public vote that I can find no record of.

It Exists, now where is it?

The City’s one year extension with FCCL expired at the beginning of this year. In December (2012), Council voted to select a new provider. The staff report recommending the change refers to FCCL as the incumbent provider. This means the City did sign a contract with FCCL – the exact contract requested.

I emailed the City Clerk requesting clarification and await a response from the City.

We can do better, we expect better

The Newspapers Canada audit revealed that Hamilton’s government bodies are failing to be transparent and not acting within the spirit of openness. We need to ask our public officials act to enforce transparency.

When your local candidate for MPP knocks on your door this week, ask them what they will do to fix our broken FOI system.

Corrections: I corrected stated the dates of the City Council meetings as being in January of 2010. In fact, both occurred in February. I regret the error.

0 0 235 more
Posted by on 21 September

Get out and vote: Hamilton area advance polls mapped

Do you know which local candidate or provincial party you plan to vote for?

If so, do you know that you can vote today, tomorrow, and for the next week and a half?

To make it even easier to vote, here’s a map of all the advance polls in the Hamilton area.

What’s the catch? You have to vote within your riding -that’s it. No need to go to the nearest advance polling station, you can vote at any of the advance polls in your riding.

You’ll probably pick the closest, but maybe you live in Flamborough and work at McMaster. If so, you can vote during a break at CIBC Hall today and tomorrow.

Some polls are open every day until advance polling ends on September 30, 2011.

Many are only open a select few days during the period. The yellow dots are the polling locations, click on the dot to see what days and hours that poll is open. The largest white map markers are the returning offices – they are open every day from 10:00am until 8:00pm.

The map is licensed under the Open Database License 1.0.

You can download the listing of poll locations in the Hamilton Area from the Fusion Table here.

You may embed the map on your website using the code below:

<script type="text/javascript">
var PollMapConfig = { height: 600, width: 650 };
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='http://www.joeycoleman.ca/files/maps/pollmap.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>

 

0 0 86 more
Posted by on 20 September

Full Audio: Anthony Marco’s lovehate podcast 196: Of Wiki Bibles and Burning Beiber Books

[audio:http://blog.joeycoleman.ca/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/lovehate196.mp3|titles=Anthony Marco's lovehate podcast 196: Of Wiki Bibles and Burning Beiber Books]

The Ontario Liberal Party is demanding the NDP dump their candidate in Niagara West-Glanbrook for comments had made on his podcast claiming that Marco failed to condemn Nazism.

Mr. Marco was discussing the Dove World Quran-burning controversy in the podcast.

The NDP is standing by their candidate and released the following transcript of the section of the podcast in question.

For the most part, I would never advocate burning books. When I read a book, as bad as the book is, I’m the type of person that wouldn’t throw books away, I’ve got books all over the place, maybe I should throw books away, but I don’t throw them away.

But there are a couple that I would suggest burning, and it’s not even from an ideological perspective. Like “oh, burn stuff by Adolph Hitler…” Whatever.  If you want to read that stuff, read that stuff. For some people the old politics of Nazi Germany might be their religion. And just as I can’t condemn other people’s religion, I can’t, I don’t agree with them, but you can’t stop somebody from believing in something. And to bash your head against the wall trying, is not their fault, it’s your fault.  You’re the one who is pretty messed up if you’re going to devote your entire life to trying to convince somebody not to believe what they believe.

So, If you’re going to be burning books over the next little while, here’s what I suggest you do: Just sit back, don’t burn any books for a while.  Get a real book hate-on. Just envision, nothing on the cover, just a book, generic book, no title, no picture, and think of the fire burning.

And now what I want you to do is as you see that fire burning, I want an image to come to your mind on the cover of that book.  And not just that book but a stack of them, a hundred books, a thousand books, all stacked up in a pile, all burning a la Fahrenheit 451, and every single copy is burning in the flames and pieces of charred paper are flying off into the atmosphere, endangering other people’s households, I want you to look at the cover of that book, and all of those books, with exactly the same cover and I want you to see… Justin Bieber’s autobiography.

If you want something to burn, and feel good about it, burn Bieber’s book.

You’ve been listening to lovehatethings.com, the love/hate podcast.

Here is the full podcast to allow you to listen to the comments in their full context:

[audio:http://blog.joeycoleman.ca/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/lovehate196.mp3|titles=Anthony Marco's lovehate podcast 196: Of Wiki Bibles and Burning Beiber Books]

This posting of the complete audio file is done due to a public interest in knowing the full context of a audio broadcast which is the subject of a political election campaign. To solely pick out sections of the recording is to not serve the public interest in deciding for themselves of the merits of the candidate’s statements.

0 0 57 more
Posted by on 19 September

Creating the ADFW poll locations maps (Part 1 of 3)

This is my first attempt at offering a step-by-step guide to creating data journalism products. The product is a rough map of polling locations in the Hamilton, Ontario provincial riding of Ancaster-Dundas-Flamborough-Westdale.

You’ll likely suggest better methods of cleaning data. I look forward to your comments sharing them.


In this tutorial, we’ll take raw polling place data from Elections Ontario and make it a dataset that can be merged with mapping data to create a map of Ancaster-Dundas-Flamborough-Westdale election day poll locations.

<iframe src="http://www.google.com/fusiontables/embedviz?viz=MAP&q=select+col2+from+1541638+&h=false&lat=43.27163209782118&lng=-79.9451984360352&z=10&t=1&l=col2" scrolling="no" width="100%" height="500px">

There are more tutorials to make more advance versions of this data map. In step two, we’ll create a map that includes the polling district boundaries. In step three, we’ll use javascript to create to add real interactivity.


Elections Ontario sent the McMaster Students Union a list of the polling locations for Ancaster-Dundas-Flamborough-Westdale. The list is designed for printing and sorted by polling place name with poll numbers group into one field.

The data was not in a format that could be used for mapping polling locations.


It needs cleaning up and unfortunately, my Excel scripting skills could use some work. I did a manual clean-up of the data.

Setting up the spreadsheet for geocoding

We need to geocode the poll locations.

Before taking the addresses from Excel, We add a column beside them with the text “Ontario” on each line to prevent the geocoder from guessing locations outside of Ontario. We’ll also add three more blank columns beside this temporary column.

Name these columns Lat, Long, Extra1, and Extra2.

For better clarity, we’ll rename Name to PollLocation and Address to PollStreetAddress.

The document sent by Elections Ontario is designed for printing and included column headers throughout, remove them. Also remove the top two rows of the spreadsheet with title information. It is not needed.

The Excel data is now ready for extraction for geocoding and the rows should look like this row:

PollLocationName PollStreetAddress Lat Long Extra1 Extra2 Polls Assigned Mobile
BALACLAVA P.S. 280 10TH CONCESSION RD E, FREELTON Ontario 001, 002, 003, 014
Geocoding the data using GPS Visualizer

We’ll use my favourite geocoder is GPS Visualizer’s Address Locator: http://www.gpsvisualizer.com/geocoder/

The advantage of using GPS Visualizer is that it maps the results enabling visual confirmation and easy sighting of major geocoding errors.

Let’s select all the rows under the columns PollStreetAddress and Lat.

We’ll copy this data from Excel into the webform on GPSvisualizer. The text should look like this:

329 PARKSIDE DR,  WATERDOWN    Ontario
211 PARKSIDE DR, WATERDOWN    Ontario
50 HATT ST, DUNDAS    Ontario
374 JERSEYVILLE RD W, ANCASTER    Ontario
93 KITTY MURRAY LANE, ANCASTER    Ontario
310 WILSON ST E, ANCASTER    Ontario
622 ALBERTON RD S, ALBERTON    Ontario

(Note there are 81 rows of addresses, above is only the first 7 rows)

We select the Yahoo! geocoder, click ‘Start geocoding’, and let it do it’s magic.

Screencap of geocoding result for ADFW polling locations map V1

Screencap of geocoding result for ADFW polling locations map V1

As can been seen on the map, there is one poll with an geocoding error. (Click here to see the map without the addition of “Ontario” to the addresses.)

Correcting the lat/long geocoding error

The geocoding result needs to be formatted for insertion into the Excel spreadsheet. Use “Ctrl+A” to select all the results. Newer versions of Excel automatically format the data correctly into each row. If not, use the “Text to Columns” feature to split the data into columns. (An example of Text to Columns is available further down in this tutorial)

Sort the lat/long results to find the outliner. In this case, it’s “49.384258,-84.756271,”526 CARLUKE RD W, CARLUKE, Ontario”,-,”

The 49′ in the latitude is the giveaway.

A quick google search of the address reveals “526 CARLUKE RD W.” to be a church within Ancaster. Hamilton and its former municipalities have absorbed many towns over the decades. Most of them keep their old names in local use, but are not officially recognized. This causes many geocoding errors with local data.

Back to GPS Visualizer to get the coords for “526 CARLUKE RD W, ANCASTER, Ontario” The result: 43.144825 -79.986464.

Replace the incorrect geocode with the correct location.

Merging the geocoding into the dataset

Copy the lat/long into the datasheet the poll information by pasting it over the “Ontario column”. The column created beside “Ontario” will take the longitude data which is why we created it.

Use the Extra1 and Extra2 column to visually verify the geocodes are in the proper place. Once complete, delete the extra columns.

Your data should look like this:

Making the map – importing the data

Save the spreadsheet. I’ve used the name “ADFW_ElectionDay_Poll_Locations” and stored it in CSV format using the “Save as” command.

A screencap of MS Excel "save as" for CSV

A screencap of MS Excel "save as" for CSV

Import the CSV or Excel file into Google Fusion Tables (http://www.google.com/fusiontables/Home) by the following steps:

Screencap of the GoogleFT New Table button

Click the "New table" button and choose "Import table"

Follow the Import table wizard to upload the spreadsheet file. The last step of the Import wizard is creating the table information. This information is available to anyone looking at your Google Fusion Table.

Screencap of the GoogleFT table information entry page

Screencap of the GoogleFT table information entry page

Table name: 2011 Ontario Provincial Election Day polling locations in Ancaster-Dundas-Flamborough-Westdale
Allow export: Yes, we want people to download our work and use it for other maps and projects.
Attribute data to: ADFW DRO – Elections Ontario
Attribution page link:http://wemakevotingeasy.ca/en/home.aspx (We’ll update this link if/when Elections Ontario publishes this data on the web)
Description: A list of all 2011 Ontario provincial election day polling locations in the riding of Ancaster-Dundas-Flamborough-Westdale.

Making the map – setting the options before visualization

We now have all our data in the Fusion Table, we need to confirm the import wizard properly recognizes our Lat and Long columns as location data and the PollStreetAddress as text.

From the menu above the table, select “Edit ===> Modify Columns”.

All columns except Lat and Long are of the type “Text”. The Lat column is “Location” and Long is “Number”. Click on “Lat” and the following should appear:

Screencap of the GoogleFT Modify columns view

We need to share the map with the public. In the top right corner, there is the “Share” button. Click it.

Screencap of the GoogleFT "Share this table" options

Select “Public” under visibility options and close the popup.

With this, we’re ready to visualize our map.

Visualizing the map

Select “Visualize ===> Map”. We now have a map of all the poll locations with default settings. The red dots are the most visible option. We’ll change them first. Click “Configure styles”:

Screencap of the GoogleFT "Configure map styles" options box

For this example, we’ll select “large_red”.

The default information bubble includes a listing of all the data in the spreadsheet.


We want to change this. Click “Configure info window” The following pops-up. Deselect “Lat”, “Long”, and “Mobile”.

Screencap of the GoogleFT "Configure info window contents" options box

We want to configure the info window labels that our readers will see. Now that we’ve removed unneeded information, we can select custom to change the labels. In custom, we can change our labels from the column name to words more familiar to our readers. I’ve chosen to change the order and use the following HTML code:

ADFW Polls: {Polls Assigned}
Voting Location:
{PollLocationName}
{PollStreetAddress}

This is the new information bubble.

Resize and move your map into the position you wish people to see it

We’ll be using the Fusion Tables embed option to show our map. Viewers will see the same map as the creator does in Fusion Tables. It is for this reason that we must zoom and position our map exactly how we wish the viewer to see it.

Getting the embed code for your website.

With this, we have a very simple map that is ready for embedding on a website. Click “Get embeddable link” for the HTML code to copy and paste into your website.

When you paste the code, you may wish to change the width and height to best suit our suit. For this site, I set “width=”100%”" to take up the full size of my content column, and “height=”500px”" to get the full map height visible. The embed code becomes:

<iframe src="http://www.google.com/fusiontables/embedviz?viz=MAP&q=select+col2+from+1541638+&h=false&lat=43.27163209782118&lng=-79.9451984360352&z=10&t=1&l=col2" scrolling="no" width="100%" height="500px">

Here’s the map:

Same Bat Time, Same Bat Channel

This is a very simple map and only the start of the process.

I hope you were able to learn from this tutorial.

Return to my blog in a day or two for the second tutorial when I add the polling boundaries to the map which will enable voters to know what poll they live in and where they will be voting.

 


EXTRA: Geocode errors without province to limit geocoder.

 

An example of geocoding errors resulting from lack of province in address

An example of geocoding errors resulting from lack of province in address

0 1 148 more
Posted by on 13 September

Hamilton Spectator’s thespec.com gets Torstar’s first metered paywall

Please note there are disclosures at the end of this post

The Hamilton Spectator is joining the growing list of local newspaper websites charging for online access to their news content.

The change was announced this morning on thespec.com by managing editor Howard Elliott:

Effective today, Tuesday, Sept. 13, 2011, thespec.com is adopting a metered model.

This means that each spec.com user may view a certain number of content pages in a given month, and upon reaching that limit, will be asked to purchase a monthly subscription for digital access.

To begin with, we are setting that limit at 35, which means that users can view up to that number of articles per month and will then be asked to subscribe.

The Spectator is the first Torstar daily to experiment with erecting a paywall and one of the first major Canadian dailies to do so. This experiment will be closely watched across North America.

There are two major providers of commercial news paywalls in the market: Google and Press+. Torstar has chosen Press+, joining the majority of online news paywalls in using that system. Google’s paywall is a new entrant to the landscape and only used by a handful of publications at present.

In search of online revenue

I am convinced a better revenue model is needed for high quality journalism.

The Hamilton Spectator is one of only a handful of organizations producing original news content in Hamilton and its competitors shamelessly reuse Spectator content instead of going out and finding news stories. Without The Spectator, the news void in Hamilton would be noticeable and with less staff than a year ago, The Spectator needs to find funds to revitalize itself and produce the kinds of interactive informative web content that people are starting to expect from news organizations.

Original content costs money. That money must come from somewhere.

It’s chicken or egg – which will come first: the high quality content needed to produce revenue or the revenue to produce high quality content?

The metered paywall and other revenue opportunities

The metered paywall is part of that model and some form of payment from the news customer is a preferable revenue source than a continuing lost of editorial independence by an over reliance on government and government-sector advertising.

The paywall could serve to fund thespec.com. The metered paywall proposed by The Hamilton Spectator is fatally flawed – it’s asking for those who already finance the paper as print subscribers to dig deeper and pay an extra $2.95/month to use the website beyond the “free” 35 pageviews.

I’ve worked at The Hamilton Spectator including four months in-house on the website. I shattered their online traffic records with live coverage of Hamilton City Council debating the Pan Am stadium last August and know there is a huge opportunity for the paper to monetize its online content.

The paper needs to look at new revenue streams other than digging deeper into the pockets of their most loyal readers.

41,192 people watched the online stream of Hamilton City Council on August 10th, but thespec.com did not serve one video ad that day. Their biggest day of traffic and there was no ability to make money (beyond banner ads on thespec.com) from having nearly 10 per cent of the local population visiting the site viewing the livestream.*

A year later, as far as I know, thespec.com still doesn’t have a video revenue plan.

thespec.com is not the go-to place for reference information; thespec.com is missing out on evergreen revenue opportunities. The paywall won’t fix what internally ails news organizations. (The Chicago Tribune is a good example of reference information making money: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/data/)

Time for non-subscribers to pay-up

For the non-subscribers to The Hamilton Spectator. The time has come to pay if you want high quality content. $6.95/mth is not much to fund original journalism. Think of it as insurance against rampant government corruption.

The free ride must come to an end. If one does not want to pay for content, it is true there are alternative websites to go looking for news. If those alternatives can produce high-quality consistent journalism, then I’ll be joining you.

Looking at the paywall structure

I emailed Spectator managing editor Howard Elliott about the paywall this morning. He promptly responded to my email with honest answers.

Mr. Elliott confirmed that access to thespec.com will be a monthly charge of $2.95 for print subscribers and $6.95 for non subscribers.

He could not confirm if there would be exceptions to the 35-pageview limit for content arrived at via social media links. Spectator blogs are excluded from the meter and “special reports such as Code Red and other utility content will be exempt.”

Similar to the New York Times, the paywall may be suspended during major events.

Asked what the goals for the pay meter are, Mr. Elliott responded:

To generate a small revenue stream from web traffic. We currently have more traffic than we can monetize through advertising and other strategies, such as migration to verticals. The limits we have in mind at present may change going forward.”

Is thespec.com jumping the shark?

By charging for online content without increasing the value of that content, thespec.com is risking jumping the shark. By using Press+, they’ve forced their print subscribers to start paying twice for content. As one print subscriber tweeted this morning:

Having to pay to view Spec online will force some of us to choose btwn subscription or online service. Won't do both!
@LarryDiIanni
Larry Di Ianni

When a former mayor of Hamilton in his early 60s is openly musing about cancelling his print subscription because of the additional cost of accessing thespec.com, Torstar must stop and take notice.

The threat of cancelling a subscription is tossed around by readers of all publications (I received them often when writing for Maclean’s and The Globe and Mail) and normally can be read purely as hyperbole. Coming from Larry Di Ianni – a man in one of The Spectator‘s prime target demographics; it cannot be ignored.

My grandmother is a heavy user of thespec.com – she wants news now – and a loyal Spectator subscriber who gave subscriptions to the paper as gifts to me a child. I know she’ll be none too impressed with the latest cost increase for the newspaper.

There is a point of no return. People get less content at a higher cost from The Spectator than they used to. I remember spending a great deal of time reading the paper every day – even a decade ago. Today, I take maybe five minutes to read the local section.

This appears to be another instance of the paper increasing prices without a correlating improvement in content or quality. (In fact, with the print redesign, there’s 15% less words on average in articles)

Paywalls should convert web readers into subscribers, not vice-versa

The Spectator cannot afford to lose any print editions to the web – print is and will remain where the money is made in journalism.

Most newspaper paywalls reward print subscribers with “free” web access. In fact, U.S. newspapers are converting web readers into print subscribers by offering Sunday newspaper subscriptions at rates below web-only access.

Eventually, the daily print edition on dead trees will be a museum relic. The weekend paper will expand and flourish – converting young people to weekly subscribers is the future revenue model. thespec.com is missing this opportunity.

Paywall, what paywall?

Personally, I won’t be affected by the paywall. I’m not trying to intentionally get around it: as a security feature, I don’t allow unknown javascript to run in my browser.

However, if you want to skirt the paywall, the MinnPost provides a great summary of holes with the Press+ paywall.

I surprised that word of the paywall did not leak out of The Spectator before it’s launch this morning. Normally, TheSpec newsroom is leakier than City Council a Press+ paywall. It’s entirely possible that more, good news, surprises are in-store. This could be the beginning of a strong web strategy for thespec.com.

What’s next?

Today’s implementation of the paywall is the first step in something. The paywall is not going away, this is Torstar’s beachhead. The complaints of a few, or even many, will not result in a rollback of the project. Let’s hope Torstar will invest the resources to make thespec.com worthy of being behind a paywall.

The news must be paid for and unless we’re willing to give over our private information to thespec.com in the same way we give everything to Facebook, we’re going to have to pay in hard currency.

 

Disclosure: I’ve worked for The Hamilton Spectator as a freelance web editor during the past year. I’ll likely continue to freelance with them in the future. The views expressed are solely my own and not influenced by The Spectator. The paper applies no pressure upon my writing. I’ve been critical of them in the past and they continue to hire me for freelance work.

CORRECTION:

I noticed upon reviewing the article the next morning that I mistakenly wrote: “beyond banner ads on thespec.com) from having nearly 10 per cent of the local population visiting the site.” In fact, I meant to express that 10 per cent of the local population tuned into the livestream. thespec.com draws significantly higher web traffic on a daily basis. I apologize for the error.

0 0 1279 more
Posted by on 13 September

blog.JoeyColeman.ca

My blog is now at blog.JoeyColeman.ca.

I’m restructuring my website to have four distinct sections:

    • JoeyColeman.ca – a professional entry page with highlights of my work and hobbies.
    • blog.JoeyColeman.ca – a blog of my thoughts, musings, and ideas.
    • data.JoeyColeman.ca – a site about open data, data journalism, and a bit of coding. Watch for this site when the first beta version of Armstrong CMS is released in the near future.
    • maps.JoeyColeman.ca – maps, mapping, map coding, design, and all things related to mapping.

I will also be launching a separate site for my coverage of municipal affairs and politics.

If you’ve linked to my content previously, don’t worry, your link is still valid. I’ve created the necessary 301 permanent redirects to prevent breaking any of my previous content.

I thank you in advance for your patience as I work (again) to reorg my web presence.

0 0 92 more
Posted by on 11 September

Needing a newspaper on 9/11

I spent the afternoon of September 11, 2001 at the John Weir Foote Armoury in Hamilton standing around awaiting direction and trying to understand the scope of the days events.

The Hamilton Spectator printed a special afternoon edition that day. I remember being ordered to await its arrival at Maves Variety. It arrived at some point in the mid-afternoon. I remember reading the paper brought a sense of order to events of the morning.

The radio and television were overwhelming, I couldn’t pause them as I tried to absorb the shock of the events. The paper gave me that.

0 0 37 more
Posted by on 11 September

The registered journalist

The Canadian Association of Journalists is asking its members for feedback regarding the proposed regulation of journalism in Quebec.

1. Do you support the title of professional journalist as proposed by the Quebec government?
2. If not, is there any model for a professional title or status for journalists that you would support?
3. What other areas of the Quebec government’s consultation document do you think the CAJ should address in its brief?

My answers to the questions are no, no, and the CAJ should lobby for government transparency for all, not special status for a limited sub-group of approved individuals.

Note: I’ve changed the title of this aside from “The certified journalist” to “The registered journalist” as I feel this best captures my thought.

0 0 38 more