Monthly Archives: February 2008

Posted by on 29 February

Photo essay: McMaster’s Israel Apartheid Rally

McMaster University was the scene of a boisterous rally today as pro-Israel and pro-Palestine took to the microphone to condemn or support Israel.

The event wasn’t good or bad – at least it didn’t break down into a physical confrontation. The “after-rally” was very hardline. Even this was kept under control by the prompt action of McMaster security to keep the two sides apart.


During the open session, the moderator (left) cut the mic of a pro-Israel speaker who continued to make his point by shouting over the moderator.


Heather Kere of the Ryerson Students’ Union told the assembled crowd that McMaster University and the McMaster Students Union were wrong to ban the poster by the Israel Apartheid Awareness Week group.


York Federation of Students Vice-President Gilary Massa lead the York delegation to attend the rally at McMaster.

Most people in the crowd were not actually students.

0 10 44 more
Posted by on 29 February

Quebec cracks down on ancillary fees

The Quebec government announced a cap on extra fees charged to students on top of tuition. The move is intended to monitor ancillary fees at universities and close loophole that allowed universities to raise fees despite strict regulation of tuition costs.

Education minister Michelle Courchesne noted that ancillary fees differ by as much as $1000 between schools. Now universities will be required to provide an outline of fees at the beginning of the year and a report at the end of the year. Universities who charge more than $700 in extra fees will only be allowed to raise this by $15 without consent from student government. Schools with lower fees may raise their fee by up to $50.

Student groups applauded the move, but acknowledged that the real problem is the underfunding of universities.

Students in Ontario have also been calling on the government to crack down on ancillary fees. Two college students filed a $200-million class action lawsuit in June, claiming that schools have been charging fees banned by government. Post-secondary institutions in Ontario are banned from charging fees that should be covered by tuition.

0 0 9 more
Posted by on 26 February

Budget 2008: Millennium Foundation to be replaced

A decade after it was created, the Canadian Millennium Scholarship Foundation will be replaced by a new needs-based, non-repayable grant program to be called the Canada Student Grant Program.

The Conservative government says that, after a year-long review of student aid, it found the Foundation had limited success in encouraging more people to attend post-secondary education and did not provide students with predictable year-to-year funding. The new grant program will replace the Foundation which expires in 2009.

The Canada Student Grant Program will distributed according to income levels. Because the grants will be awarded each year of study, students will know how much to expect in support from year to year. The grants will range from approximately $250 per month for low income students to $100 per month for middle income students. 245,000 studens will benefit from the program each year.

Student groups were split on the issue. The Canadian Alliance of Student Associations, the second largest student lobby group in the country, was disappointed in the dissolution of the Foundation, but welcomed the dedication of its funding to a needs-based grant system.

“Today’s announcement marks the end of Canada’s tenure as one of the few western industrialised nations without a national system of grants,” said Amanda Aziz, chairperson of the Canadian Federation of Students. “It was long overdue.”

“We are cautiously optimistic about the delivery mechanism for the announced grant program and will move forward bearing the responsibility of ensuring that the Canada Student Grant Program is delivered in an efficient and transparent manner,” said David Simmonds, president of the Ontario Undergraduate Student Alliance.

The new program will distribute $350 million in student aid when it begins in the fall of 2009. This amount will match the funds currently provided to students by the Canadian Millennium Scholarship Foundation. Funding will increase by $80 million in 2012/13, to $430 million. This additional funding, which the government is describing as new, is above and beyond the current $138 million a year delivered by current federally-administrated grant programs such as Canada Access Grants and Canada Study Grants. The patchwork of federal grant programs will be integrated into the new grants program.

The government says the new grants problem will address concerns about the operation of the Scholarship Foundation.

“The new Canada Student Loans Program is just a rebrand of a Liberal program,” said Liberal post-secondary critic Mike Savage. “The last time they rebranded a program was with the Canada Summer Jobs program. Their rebrand was a disaster and they restored the Liberal program. We hope history doesn’t repeat itself.”

In the budget speech, Flaherty was critical of the Foundation, saying it “had limited success in encouraging more people to go to college or university, and did not provide students with predictable funding from one year to the next.”

The Auditor General has criticized the Foundation model for lacking the same accountability provisions as government department due to their “third-party” status. The government says that the new program, administered by Human Resources and Social Development, will be more transparent.

When created, the Foundation was seen as by some provinces as an intrusion into the provincial jurisdiction of education. The administration of the Foundation required that agreements between the provinces and Foundation be negotiated. Disputes resulted which resulted in delays in getting aid to students. The new grant program will be administered using the current federal student-aid framework. Provinces that do not participate in the Canada Student Loans Program will receive equivalent funding to administer their own needs-based program.

In order to receive the new grants, students will be required to apply for student loan. If they received a loan, they will automatically be considered for the new grant. Low-income students will receive $2,000 for a eight-month school term and middle-income students will receive $800. The grant will be provided up-front to students.

The grants will be guaranteed for all years of an undergraduate or college program. The government hopes by providing the grants up-front and guaranteeing them for the length of a students program that more low-income students will enter into a post-secondary program.

The Canadian Alliance of Student Associations were also concerned that the research functions of the Millennium Scholarship Foundation would fall through the cracks. “The Foundation was the only group that was doing research on access issues. Looking at Aboriginal students, low income students, and first generation students,” said Zack Churchill, national director of the Canadian Alliance of Student Associations. “We haven’t seen any indication from the government that the federal research will be picked up.”

The government says it will ensure that students receiving Foundation bursaries in 2008-09 will be unaffected by the wind-down of the Foundation.

0 10 37 more
Posted by on 26 February

BUDGET 2008: That’s it?

The 2008 federal budget had been widely expected to contain several major initiatives in higher education, but what the Conservative government delivered on Tuesday was instead a modest tinkering with the status quo, with some additional money for research, and housekeeping changes at two major student aid programs.

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty said in the budget speech, “We must ensure that the next generation of Canadians has the opportunity to excel in this increasingly competitive world.”

Post-secondary initiatives announced in the budget will see the Canadian Millennium Scholarship Foundation replaced with a similar program; administrative changes to student loans; new scholarships for graduate students; money to help secure university laboratories and new funding for medical, automotive, and environmental research.

COMPLETE BUDGET 2008 EDUCATION COVERAGE

COMMENT Is giving less money to more students really victory?

COMMENT Good works (Paul Wells)

COMMENT Student loan borrowers keep propping up system (Julian Benedict)

NEWS Millennium Scholarship Foundation to be replaced

NEWS No interest rate cut for student loans

NEWS New funds for university research

NEWS New grad scholarships aim to attract international talent

The Canadian Millennium Scholarship Foundation, which provides $350 million a year in needs and merit based scholarships, is to be replaced in 2009 by a new, $350 million Canada Student Grants Program. Students will see little difference between the two programs. Grants will be given out based on an income assessment. Low-income students will get $2,000 a year and students from middle-income families will receive $800 for each year of study, guaranteed during the entire course of their university or college degree. Under the current Millennium program, students must reapply each year for needs-based grants. The Millennium Foundation’s merit-based scholarships are also to be phased out.

Canada Student Grants funding is budgeted to increase by $80 million by 2012-13, to $430 million.

“This government is good at spreading chunks of money here and chunks of money there with little actual new money involved,” said Liberal post-secondary critic Mike Savage. “There is no talk of expanding the student loans system to assist more students, there is no increase the amount of aid that a student can receive.”

After a year-long review of Canada Student Loans, the government is also changing the way student loans are administered. The budget allocates $23 million over four years to create a new service delivery model. The federal government also says it will work with the provinces to create a one-stop, national website to administer student loans.

An additional $26 million over four years will be used to increase loans to part-time and married students. The budget also says that the government plans to spend $76 million over four years to assist graduates experiencing difficulty repaying their student loans. However, the government did not provide any details on exactly how this money will be used, saying it still has to negotiate agreements with the provinces.

Student groups had called for lower student loan interest rates. The 2008 budget left the federal student loan interest rate unchanged.

Universities will receive $116 million in new research funding next year. The new funding is directed primarily at research with environmental or commercial applications. $80 million will go to Canada’s three major research granting councils. Genome Canada, a not-for-profit corporation that funds genomics and proteomics research will receive an additional $140 million. And $250 million will be spent over the next five years on a new Automotive Innovation Fund, which will sponsor research in the automotive sector.

Five hundred top graduate students will receive support from a new program, the Canada Graduate Scholarships. To encourage top graduate students to stay in Canada, the government will spend $25 million over the next two years to create the scholarship which will be worth up to $50,000 over three years.

To encourage parents to save for a child’s education through a Registered Education Savings plans, the amount of time that a plan may stay open has been extended from 25 to 35 years, and the maximum contribution period has been extended by 10 years.

0 5 30 more
Posted by on 26 February

Budget 2008: No interest rate cut for Canada Student Loan borrowers

After a year long review, the Conservative government announced only administrative changes to the Canada Student Loans Program in the 2008/09 federal budget.

Although sources close to government expected an interest rate cut, the Conservative government did not set student loan interest at prime. The federal rate will remain 2.5 per cent above prime, unlike Nova Scotia and Alberta that have recently announced plans to lower their provincial student loan interest rate to either prime or below prime.

The 2008 budget included plans to reform the administration of student loans but did not provide many details.

Monte Solberg, Minister of Human Resources and Social Development Canada, said in November to expect major policy changes. The announcements came as a disappointment to student loan advocates who participated in this year’s review.

“The federal budget completely ignores the key issue of reducing sky-high interest rates on borrowers in repayment. Our interest rates remain amongst the highest in the G8,” said Julian Benedict, co-founder of the Coalition for Student Loan Fairness. “The plan also ignores Canadians’ call for a national student loan Ombudsperson Office.”

The government plans to implement a “new service delivery vision” for student loans and increase the ability of students to manage their loans online from initial application until final repayment. The government will spend $23 million over four years to achieve this. The goal is to create a national portal for student loans where students from any province can apply for their loans and upon graduation, students will be able to use the site as a “one-stop” service to repay and track their loans.

The government says that students who presently deal with multiple payment points, such as students who currently negotiate their loans directly with the banks, will be able to make one payment to the website. One of the findings of the year-long review was that the current system is too complicated and many students are facing difficulty navigating the direct loan programs.

“Given all the time they had since forming government, I expected something more substantial and meaningful that just some administrative tweaking,” said NDP post-secondary critic Denise Savoie. “We are looking at the budget, but the devil is in the details and this budget was short on those details.”

The only non-administrative tweaks that were announced were the decrease of the expected spousal contribution and the increase to the amount of loans given to part-time students. These changes will cost the government $26 million over four years to implement.

Part-time students will now be able to receive up to $10,000 a year in student loans to fund their studies and will no longer be required to make monthly interest payments on their loans while studying. The government says that only about 2000 part-time students currently receive loans and they hope by making the changes, more adults will enter into part-time studies.

The government plans to spend $76 million over four years to assist graduates experiencing difficulty repaying their student loans. The government did not provide any details of what this support will entail saying they need to negotiate agreements with the provinces. The government says that only 50 per cent of students who qualify for interest relief are actually receiving it due to the complicated application process. The primary goal of the changes is to negotiate agreements with the provinces, which will result in students most in need of repayment support being able to easily access new support programs. The government is looking to create a system which will allow students facing difficulty repaying their loans to set their maximum payment to a percentage of their income.

The federal student loan program has received considerable criticism in recent months stemming from media reports claiming that the system is “broken.” For instance, Maclean’s reported that two thirds of applicants are being denied the student loan disability assistance program even if they receive disability support from their provincial government.

Critics also drew attention to the program’s interest rates and alleged poor customer service and communication. Some borrowers have been forced to file freedom of information requests to get information about their own loans. Others brought complaints directly to their MPs after not being able to resolve them directly with the program. This has lead to critics calling for a student loan ombudsperson.

Solberg’s review was announced in the 2007 federal budget. Although critics feared that the scope was too narrow — addressing only bureaucratic efficiencies.

-with a report from Erin Millar

0 3 35 more
Posted by on 25 February

Post-secondary recruitment in isolated or disadvantaged communities

The Hamilton Spectator ran a story on Saturday about a recruitment trip by Hamilton’s Mohawk College to Moose Factory in northern Ontario.

The story itself is very interesting. It is also nationally relevant – it speaks to a wider issue, the need for all post-secondary institutions to actively recruit in disadvantaged communities. (The sad fact of Canada is that some of our most disadvantaged  are isolated First Nations communities.)

The Spectator sent up one of their best photographers along with its post-secondary reporter to cover the story. The pictures add much to the story; take a look at the PDFs of the print edition for those: page 4 and page 5.

The Spectator has a web-extra multimedia slideshow to go with the story.

0 0 642 more
Posted by on 25 February

News release of the year

Colleges Ontario put out a news release at 11am this morning about its "Obay" viral marketing campaign. The campaign involves advertisements for a fictional mind-control medicine which stops young people from thinking for themselves. The goal of the campaign is to encourage parents to stop discouraging their children from pursuing a college education.

The Colleges Ontario campaign opened up a great opportunity for the Canadian Federation of Students which sent out their own release entitled "Students to Colleges: "Obay" the Law."

Now, that’s a news release.

0 2 24 more
Posted by on 25 February

While I play tourist in Ottawa

I am going to play “tourist” today in Ottawa. (I’m really meeting with people in preparation for tomorrow’s budget but checking out the sights on the side)

So, while this blog plays dead for the next 6 hours (expect posts about 5pm eastern), you can visit Paul Wells who is discussing post-secondary education on his blog today.

0 0 7 more
Posted by on 25 February

Let’s go to McMaster

This Friday, McMaster University will be the scene of a Toronto-organized protest in favour of useless rhetoric.

McMaster University denied the Palestinian “solidarity movement” the ability to hang banners screaming “Israeli Apartheid.”

This attack on inflammatory and inaccurate words cannot be tolerated. How dare the university require truth in advertising!

Not to worry, the York Federation of Students (Canadian Federation of Students Local 68) and the Ryerson Students Union (Canadian Federation of Students Local 24) will not tolerate this action.

They are paying for buses to ship protesters from Toronto to McMaster University on Friday to let the administration of McMaster know what they think.

Great, just what McMaster needs, outsiders coming in and spreading their intolerant rhetoric.

This year has been different from past years in terms of the actions of the “Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights” group. In previous years, they stuck to spreading their literature, hosting nights condemning Israel, but always maintained a level of decorum.

This year, the leadership is more radical and in your face. It’s a shame, I used to be able to respectfully disagree with them. I used to be able to accept them spreading their propaganda as they were careful to not make other students uncomfortable. This year, that seems to be their goal.

In terms of the decision by the university Provost to not allow the display of the phrase “Israeli Apartheid,” I believe it was the right decision. Israel is not an apartheid state. We all know that. There must be some standard of truth on a campus.

What effect did the decision have on the “solidarity movement” – none. They were still able to hold their event, they were still able to rant and rave, their funds were not cut. In short, beyond having a requirement for some level of honesty, the university did not stop this group from holding their event.

The group appealed to the campus human rights office. The campus human rights office stated of the university decision: “The university has taken the position that literature which refers to “Israeli apartheid” and activities promoted under the banner, “Israeli Apartheid Week” are unacceptable. The university takes the position that this phrase is in violation of the university’s efforts to ensure that all people will be treated with dignity and tolerance.”

In short, the human rights office agreed that they were not being discriminated against. The McMaster office is extremely independent of the administration. This should have told the “solidarity movement” that this time they were in the wrong.

Instead, they have gone out and requested that other “solidarity” groups come to McMaster to help them. (The radical element on campus is small and most students at McMaster prefer respectful tolerate debate.) So, this Friday, they will ship in protestors by the bus load. Rant and rave about how horrible everyone else is. Demand the privilege of being intolerant and call all kinds of people names. Should be an interesting show to watch.

All of this will be made possible using student fees paid by students at Ryerson and York. It’s nice to know that Locals 24 and 68 are looking after their students.

0 29 215 more
Posted by on 25 February

Avoid the UOttawa food

I’m presently at the University of Ottawa campus. I have been wandering around Ottawa since about 6am. Managed to get myself lost on a bus into Hull. I couldn’t seem to find a breakfast place that looked decent downtown. I figured that since I planned to visit UOttawa later in the morning anyway, I should grab breakfast here – BIG MISTAKE!

I arrived on the campus, went to the information booth and asked "Where’s a good place to grab breakfast on campus?" The lady replied by suggesting a restaurant just off-campus. I said I was looking to eat at a university food outlet. She advised me that I may want to reconsider. I knew I was in trouble then.

I grabbed breakfast from the university food service outlet in the student centre – wow, I haven’t had a breakfast this bad since…. while, since I was eating rations during army training exercises and I’m tempted to think they were better.

0 3 21 more